Doc Brown's Advanced A level theoretical chemistry revision notes

Part 8.2.6 Intermolecular forces and a more detailed discussion of the boiling points of 8 selected organic molecules from different homologous series with a similar number of electrons

[Author ©  Dr Phil Brown PhD: Doc Brown's Chemistry exam revision notes suitable for advanced A level chemistry students studying pre–university/college advanced level theoretical–physical chemistry courses:  boiling points and intermolecular bonding comparisons  [page updated May 2nd 2026 *]

(first study the introduction to intermolecular bonding 8.2.1)

email doc brown - comments - query? * [privacy, cookies and disclaimer policies]

Survey of 8 selected organic molecules – their relative boiling points and intermolecular forces

In this section I am assuming you are familiar with the different types of intermolecular bonding, particularly:

Read first Summary of Van der Waals forces and introduction to intermolecular forces

Instantaneous dipole – induced dipole interactions (London forces or dispersive forces)

Permanent dipole – permanent dipole interactions (Keesom forces/orientation forces)

and Hydrogen bonding intermolecular forces

otherwise this page might prove more difficult than is necessary!

A comparison of the boiling points of a series of selected organic compounds whose molecules have similar molecular mass (56 to 64.5) and a similar number of electrons (32 to 34) in the molecule.

This means in terms of instantaneous dipole - induced dipole forces, all the molecules have a similar polarizabilty (ignoring polar bonds and consequential attractions for the moment).

The role–effect of the intermolecular forces (intermolecular bonding) involved and the their effect on the boiling point is explained and discussed on a comparative basis and recognise different functional groups will lead to differences in the type and strength of the intermolecular forces operating between the molecules.

By the end of the page, given the structure of an aliphatic molecule of a typical homologous series, you should be able to predict the type or types of intermolecular bonding the molecule is likely to display and the effects on its physical properties.

The aliphatic molecules in question are:

1. butane (an alkane)

2. methoxyethane (an ether)

3. chloroethane (a halogenoalkane, haloalkane, alkyl halide)

4. propan-1-amine, (1–aminopropane, n–propylamine, primary aliphatic amine),

5. propanone (acetone, a ketone)

6. propan–1–ol (1–propanol, n-propyl alcohol)

7. ethanoic acid (acetic acid, a carboxylic acid)

8. ethanamide (acetamide, a primary amide).

Some abbreviations used

sat'd p_vap = saturated vapour pressure at 20^oC (a measure of ease of vaporisation)

mpt. = melting point ^oC  and  bpt. = boiling point ^oC

ΔH_vap = enthalpy of vaporisation in kJmol

8.2.6 Survey of 8 selected similar sized organic molecules containing 32 or 34 electrons – their boiling points and intermolecular forces are compared.

Good idea to first read A summary of Van der Waals forces and introduction to intermolecular forces

8.2.6 Detailed Discussion of the eight individual molecules representing eight homologous series

1. ALKANE butane
   • CH₃CH₂CH₂CH₃, M_r = 58 and 34 electrons
   • Mpt –138^oC, bpt –0.5^oC, ΔH_vap = 22 kJ mol^–1
   • saturated p_vap = 211316 Pa/1585 mmHg at 20^oC when liquefied under pressure.
   • Alkanes are non–polar molecules where the only intermolecular force operating is the weakest possible, that is the instantaneous dipole – induced dipole intermolecular forces. These are sometimes called London–dispersion forces and occur between ALL molecules, even single atoms of the noble gases.
     • Van der Waals forces include all types of intermolecular forces which are not due to an actual chemical bond BUT sometimes this name is used just to mean these instantaneous dipole – induced dipole dispersive forces (sorry but it can be confusing!).
     • The electronegativities are: C (2.5) and H (2.2) and produces a virtually non–polar bond and any very small effects will tend to cancel out e.g. H–C–H situations and so alkanes are the least polar organic molecules i.e. as near non–polar molecules you will get.
   • These electrical attractive forces act between ANY atoms or molecules and is primarily a function of the number of electrons in the molecule, though their spatial distribution can be significant.
   • The larger the molecule, i.e. the greater the number of electrons in it, the more polarizable it is and the greater the chance of a random instantaneous dipole occurring to induce a dipole in a neighbouring molecule, so increasing the intermolecular attractive forces.
   • The force arises from the instantaneous and random asymmetry of the electron fields in the atomic orbitals because of the random behaviour of electrons in the atomic or molecular orbitals.
   • A transient δ+ in one molecule induces a transient δ– in a neighbouring molecule, so causing a very weak and transient electrical attraction.
     • Note that these partial charges are shown as a delta + (δ+) or a delta – (δ–) and they are tiny charges compared to a full single plus charge e.g. on an Na⁺ sodium ion or a full single minus charge  on a Cl^– chloride ion.
   • This polarisation can readily occur when particles collide with each other e.g. in liquids or vibrate against each other e.g. in a solid. In this situation electron clouds from neighbouring atoms/molecule will repel each other and the distortion of the charge distribution causes the polarization. Under these circumstances, contact between any two atoms/molecules can produce temporary or transient polarisation.
     • •••• attractions
   • Total intermolecular force = 100% (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole force)
   • This is why, in doing comparisons, you should choose molecules of similar molecular mass, and, in particular, the same total number of electros to give a 'base–line' of comparable effects.
   • You can then judge the effects of changing molecular structure e.g. polar bonds increasing the inter–molecular attractive forces between polar molecules with a permanent dipole.
   • In examples 2 to 8, all the molecules will exhibit the effects of the 32–34 electrons in the molecule in terms of instantaneous dipole – induced dipole plus an extra intermolecular force effect due to polar bonds, and in these descriptions it will now be assumed you are aware that instantaneous dipole – induced dipole attractions are ever present!
   • Alkanes and Petrochemical Industry revision notes INDEX
   • -
2. ETHER methoxyethane (methyl ethyl ether, 'ether')
   • CH₃CH₂OCH₃, Mr = 60 and 34 electrons.
   • Mpt –139^oC, bpt 7^oC, ΔH_vap =  21 kJ mol^–1, sat'd p_vap =  160000 Pa/1216 mmHg at 20^oC when liquefied under pressure.
   • Although there are polar C–O bonds (electronegativities: O 3.5 > C 2.5), ^δ+C–^δ–O^δ––C^δ+, the C–O–C ether linkage means each polar bond cancels the other out so there is only a small polarity effect in the molecule due to the C–O–C bond angle of 109^o. The boiling point is only a little above that of non–polar alkanes and a little below halogenoalkanes.
   • Methoxyethane is isomeric with propan–2–ol which has much greater boiling point due to hydrogen bonding.
   • So, for methoxymethane, almost all the intermolecular attraction arises from instantaneous dipoles – induced dipoles.
   • Total intermolecular force = (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole) + (permanent dipole – permanent dipole) + (permanent dipole – induced dipole)
     • A theoretical figure quoted for ethoxyethane, a similar molecule, for the total intermolecular force was
     • (86.5%  instantaneous  dipole – induced dipole) + (7.4% permanent dipole – permanent dipole) + (4.4% permanent dipole – induced dipole))
     • (86.5% dispersive forces) + (7.4% Keesom forces) + (4.4% Debye forces)
   • –
3. HALOGENOALKANE (haloalkanes) chloroethane (ethyl chloride)
   • CH₃CH₂Cl, M_r = 64.5 and 34 electrons.
   • Mpt –136^oC, bpt 12.5^oC, ΔH_vap =  25 kJ mol^–1, sat'd p_vap =  133322 Pa/1000 mmHg at 20^oC when liquefied under pressure.
   • Halogenoalkanes are weakly polar molecules with the C^δ+–X^δ– polar bond (X = halogen) due to the difference in electronegativities (Pauling values) of carbon and halogens, e.g. Cl(3.0) > C(2.5) giving C^δ+–Cl^δ–.
   • This gives rise to a weak, but permanent dipole, hence the extra permanent dipole – permanent dipole intermolecular attractive forces raising the bpt and ΔH_vap and lowering the vapour pressure compared to butane.
   • BUT the effect is quite small, so, for chloroethane, despite the C–Cl polar bond, almost all the intermolecular attraction arises from instantaneous dipoles – induced dipoles.
     • •••• attractions
   • Total intermolecular force = (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole) + (permanent dipole – permanent dipole) + (permanent dipole – induced dipole)
   • One reason why the polar bond, the origin of the permanent dipole, doesn't have as greater effect for a molecule as the same number of electrons as butane is that 8 of the electrons are tightly held in the 2nd inner shell and might not be as polarizable?
   • Index of ALL revision notes on halogenoalkanes (haloalkanes)
   • -
4. PRIMARY ALIPHATIC AMINE
   1. propan-1-amine (1–aminopropane, n–propylamine, propylamine)

   • CH₃CH₂CH₂NH₂, M_r =  59 and 34 electrons.

   • Mpt ^oC, bpt 48^oC, ΔH_vap =  30 kJ mol^–1, sat'd p_vap =  33060 Pa/248 mmHg at 20^oC.
   • Amines are permanently polar molecules because of the polarised N–H bond giving rise to hydrogen bonding.
   • Electronegativities N (3.5) > H (2.1), giving the polar bond ^δ–N–H^δ+ (permanent dipole).
   • It appears that the tiny partially positive proton can get relatively close to the lone pair of electrons on the very electronegative nitrogen atom and produce the strongest possible permanent dipole – permanent dipole attraction and this special case is called 'hydrogen bonding'.
   • This only happens, bar a few exceptions, with the three most electronegative elements namely, nitrogen, oxygen and fluorine.
     • ^δ–N–H^{δ+  δ–}O–H^{δ+  δ+}H–F^δ– 
   • Hydrogen bonding is the strongest type of intermolecular force arising from permanent dipole – permanent dipole attraction and the partially positive proton end of one molecule attracts the partially negative nitrogen (or oxygen/fluorine) lone pair end of a close neighbouring molecule.
   •  llll ^δ–N–H^δ+llll^δ–N–H^δ+llll^δ–N–H^δ+  etc. (a hydrogen bond is often denoted by llll)
   • Total intermolecular force = (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole) + (permanent dipole – permanent dipole including hydrogen bonding) + (permanent dipole – induced dipole)
   • On a delta(+) ... delta(–) charge basis, the effect of a highly polar bond outweighs an individual instantaneous – induced dipole
     • BUT there may several temporary dipoles occurring at the same time, particularly in a larger molecule of many electrons, so the permanently polar bond dipole is in most cases an extra contribution to the total intermolecular force and not necessarily the dominant contributor.
       • (see boiling point and solubility trends with primary alcohols).
   • The hydrogen bonding effect is not as great as for alcohols probably because oxygen is more electronegative than nitrogen and there are two lone pairs of electrons on the oxygen atom, just one on the nitrogen atom - less 'sites' on the molecule to hydrogen bond with a neighbouring molecule.
   • More notes on 'hydrogen bonding'

   • The chemistry of ORGANIC-NITROGEN compounds

   • –
5. KETONE propanone (acetone)
   • CH₃COCH₃, M_r = 58 and 32 electrons.
   • Mpt –95^oC, bpt 56^oC, ΔH_vap =  29 kJ mol^–1, sat'd p_vap = 24131 Pa/181 mmHg at 20^oC.
   • Ketones are permanently polarised molecules due to the highly polar bond ^δ+C=O^δ– caused by the difference in electronegativities of carbon and oxygen i.e. O(3.5) > C(2.5).
   • This causes the permanent dipole – permanent dipole interaction between neighbouring polar molecules
   • via ^δ+C=O^δ–....^δ+C=O^δ– attractive interactions further illustrated below
   • ••••extra attractions
   • The vapour pressure is reduced, and the bpt. and ΔH_vap increased compared to butane because there is a 2nd intermolecular force operating.
   • Total intermolecular force = (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole) + (permanent dipole – permanent dipole) + (permanent dipole – induced dipole)
     • Theoretical data from the web quoted for the total intermolecular force
     • (14.2%  instantaneous  dipole – induced dipole force) + (78.4% permanent dipole – permanent dipole) + (7.4% permanent dipole – induced dipole)
   • The effect is also greater than for chloroethane because the electronegativity difference between C and O is greater than C and Cl, giving a more polar molecule, so stronger permanent dipole – permanent dipole intermolecular attractive forces.
   • Note that you can't get hydrogen bonding here because no H attached to a very electronegative atom O.
   • Aldehydes isomeric with ketones will have a similar boiling point i.e. the similar intermolecular forces (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole plus permanent dipole – permanent dipole intermolecular forces e.g.
   • CH₃CH₂CHO, propanal (propionaldehyde), M_r = 58 and 32 electrons.
   • Mpt –81^oC, bpt 49^oC, ΔH_vap =  31.5 kJ mol^–1, sat'd p_vap = 31300 Pa/235 mmHg at 20^oC.

   • The chemistry of ALDEHYDES and KETONES

   • -

6. ALCOHOL propan–1–ol (1–propanol, propyl alcohol, a primary alcohol)
   • CH₃CH₂CH₂OH, M_r = 60 and 34 electrons.
   • Mpt –127^oC, bpt 97^oC, ΔH_vap = 45 kJ mol^–1, sat'd p_vap = 1933 Pa/14.5 mmHg at 20^oC.
   • Alcohols are permanently polarised molecule due to the highly polar bond ^δ–O–H^δ+ caused by the difference in electronegativities between oxygen and hydrogen i.e. O(3.5) > H(2.1).
   • This causes the permanent dipole – permanent dipole interaction between neighbouring polar molecules (shown below).
     • •••• extra attractions
     • The same polar bonds can also lead to hydrogen bonding - the stronger spatially directed permanent dipole - permanent dipole attraction forces.
     • ^δ–:O–H^δ+llll^δ–:O–H^δ+ ... etc.    (llll represents the directional hydrogen bond)
     • Note that the lone pairs on the most electronegative atom are important to show on a fully detailed diagram (though I haven't always done so on this page). The hydrogen bond is directional i.e. the proton lines up with the lone pair which is effectively the delta minus and this should come out in a full diagram showing the hydrogen bonding between molecules.
     • 
     • a more correct hydrogen bonding diagram for alcohols
   • So called hydrogen bonding is the strongest of the permanent dipole – permanent dipole intermolecular forces, but it is NOT a true ionic or covalent chemical bond in the sense that electrons are NOT transferred or shared to form the bond.
     • PLEASE NOTE, to get things in perspective, apart from a few molecules like water, the instantaneous dipole - induced dipole force is the largest contributor to the overall intermolecular force of attraction between molecules.
   • Total intermolecular force = (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole) + (permanent dipole – permanent dipole including hydrogen bonding) + (permanent dipole – induced dipole)
     • I couldn't find data for propan-1-ol, but obtained some for two other alcohols and water for comparison.
     • A theoretical figure quoted for 2–methylpropan–2–ol (tert–butanol), a similar molecule, for the total intermolecular force was: (67.2%  instantaneous  dipole – induced dipole) + (23.1% permanent dipole – permanent dipole including H bonding) + (9.7% permanent dipole – induced dipole)
     • Note that the hydrogen bonding only contributes ~¹/₄ of the total intermolecular force (Van der Waals forces) but this is sufficient to raise the boiling point significantly above that of a non–polar molecule of similar molecular mass (particularly if similar number of electrons).
     • However in the case of ethanol you would expect a greater contribution from the permanent dipole – permanent dipole interactions (including the hydrogen bonding) and this is the case.
     • A quotation for ethanol was: (42.6%  instantaneous  dipole – induced dipole) + (47.6% permanent dipole – permanent dipole including H bonding) + (9.8% permanent dipole – induced dipole)
     • This would suggest that the contributions to the intermolecular forces for propan-1-ol would be somewhere in between these values.
     • Textbooks tend to indicate that hydrogen bonding is the predominant intermolecular force in molecules such as alcohols, but this is very rarely the case.
     • Only a few molecules like methanol (methyl alcohol), methanamide (formamide) and ethanamide (acetamide) really), for the vast majority of molecules the predominant intermolecular attraction is the instantaneous dipole – induced dipole interaction (the weakest of the forces!).
     • For water H-O-H  the intermolecular force contributions are: (10.5%  instantaneous  dipole – induced dipole) + (84.8% permanent dipole – permanent dipole including H bonding) + (4.5% permanent dipole – induced dipole)
   • The vapour pressure is reduced, and the bpt. and ΔH_vap considerably increased compared to butane because of this 2nd intermolecular force operating – hydrogen bonding.
   • The effect is also greater than for the polar chloroethane/propanone for two reasons
     • (i) the electronegativity difference between O and H is greater than for  C and Cl or C and O giving a more polar bond
     • (ii) the small size of the hydrogen atom of one molecule allows it to get nearer to the oxygen of a neighbouring molecule increasing the strength of this particular intermolecular force.
   • Propan–2–ol is isomeric with methoxyethane which has a much lower boiling point due to lack of hydrogen bonding.
   • More on hydrogen bonding
   • Index of all revision notes on the physical and chemical properties of alcohols

   • An important exam note:

   • You must clearly show the directional linearity of the X^δ--H^δ+ǁǁǁ:X^δ- arrangement of the hydrogen bond including the single X-H covalent bond and the lone pair on the other X atom too! (X is usually O, N or F)

   • You must do this accurately in exams when drawing intermolecular bonding diagrams of water or alcohols because it is the only spatially directed intermolecular force, all the rest of the other types of intermolecular bonding forces are randomised - the δ+ and δ- electric fields acting in all directions.

   • -

7. CARBOXYLIC ACID ethanoic acid (acetic acid)
   • CH₃COOH, M_r = 60 and 32 electrons.
   • Mpt 17^oC, bpt 118^oC, ΔH_vap = 58 kJ mol^–1, sat'd p_vap = 1520 Pa/11.4 mmHg at 20^oC.
   • Of the five compared organic molecules, ethanoic acid has the highest bpt and ΔH_vap and lowest vapour pressure at 20^oC.
   • This is because as well as the instantaneous dipole – induced dipole attraction, there are two sources of permanent dipole – permanent dipole interactions.
     • Permanent dipole – permanent dipole interaction between neighbouring polar molecules via the carbonyl group ^δ+C=O^δ–....^δ+C=O^δ– (see propanone above for more details),
     • and the even stronger hydrogen bonding via the hydroxyl group ^δ–O–H^δ+llll^δ–:O–H^δ+ (see propan–1–ol above for more details) ...
     • BUT there are two principal structures which can arise from hydrogen bonding via
     • the ^δ+C=O:^δ–llll^δ+H–O^δ– linking molecules of ethanoic acid together, a linear dimer (below) or a cyclic dimer (further down) and the latter is the more predominant hydrogen bonding interaction.
     • •••• extra attractions
   • Total intermolecular force = (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole) + (permanent dipole – permanent dipole including hydrogen bonding) + (permanent dipole – induced dipole)
   • I've recently found a research paper from 1999 that liquid ethanoic acid consists of 'polymers' of ethanoic acid held together by hydrogen bonding via ^δ+C=O:^δ–llll^δ+H–O^δ–llll^δ+C=O:^δ–llll^δ+H–O^δ– etc. linkages. They may be linear dimers or longer species.
   • Then I was sent another research paper from 2001 which claimed the principal species in liquid ethanoic acid is the cyclic dimer shown below.
   • 
   • Formation of a carboxylic acid dimer via hydrogen bonding. R = alkyl or aryl
   • Whatever species exist in liquid ethanoic acid, and its probably a mixture of all the species mentioned above, quite simply, in boiling ethanoic acid you are effectively vaporising a larger molecule prior to vaporization and therefore more energy needed to vapourise it i.e. a higher boiling point where the particles at a higher temperature have enough kinetic energy to 'escape' the intermolecular forces at the surface..
   • Also, whatever the structure of liquid ethanoic acid at the molecular level, hydrogen bonding is primarily responsible for the creation of a larger molecular species of (CH₃COOH)n, with n>1.
   • In the cyclic dimer structure, the hydrogen bonds create a larger molecule with a total of 64 electrons and this alone would considerably increase the boiling point of ethanoic acid.
   • As an 'electron' point of comparison, octan–1–ene (1–octene), C₈H₁₆, has 64 electrons and boils at 121^oC close to the 118^oC bpt of ethanoic acid, whose dimer also has 64 electrons.
   • There is plenty of evidence from vapour pressure/density measurement that dimer does exist as a high % mole fraction of ethanoic acid vapour as well as in the liquid.
   • More on hydrogen bonding

   •  The chemistry of CARBOXYLIC ACIDS, ESTERS and other derivatives

   • -

8. ACID AMIDE  ethanamide (acetamide, acid/acyl amide)
   • CH₃CONH₂, Mr =59 and 32 electrons.
   • Mpt 82^oC, bpt 221^oC, ΔH_vap = 46 kJ mol^–1, sat'd p_vap = ? Pa/? mmHg but very low at 20^oC since it is solid.
   • Permanent dipole – permanent dipole interaction between neighbouring polar molecules via the carbonyl group ^δ+C=O^δ–....^δ+C=O^δ– (see propanone above for more details) ..
   • ... and ethanamide is even higher boiling than ethanoic acid because there are more hydrogen bonds possible.
   • There are two sites on the molecule for hydrogen bonding
   • (i) The –NH₂ group i.e.  ^δ–N–H^δ+llll^δ–:N–H^δ+ as well as the hydrogen bonding due to
   • (ii) ^δ+C=O:^δ–llll^δ+H–N^δ– interactions, the latter (ii) are probably the dominant inter molecular force if ethanoic acid provides a model.
   • Total intermolecular force = (instantaneous dipole – induced dipole) + (permanent dipole – permanent dipole including hydrogen bonding) + (permanent dipole – induced dipole)
     • A theoretical figure quoted for methanamide (formamide), a similar molecule, for the total intermolecular force was
     • (3.2%  instantaneous  dipole – induced dipole) + (93.3% permanent dipole – permanent dipole including H bonding) + (3.5% permanent dipole – induced dipole)
     • This is one of the very few molecules where the majority of the intermolecular force originates from hydrogen bonding.
   • I don't know if acyl amides can form polymers or dimers via hydrogen bonding in the way that carboxylic acids do?
   • Its worth noting, in view of the high boiling point of ethanamide, a reflection of the strong intermolecular forces, that the ^δ+C=O:^δ–llll^δ+H–N^δ– interaction is the most important hydrogen bond that holds together the secondary structure of proteins to give the sheet and helical structures AND about 50% of the hydrogen bonds that hold together the single helix structure of RNA molecules and the double helix structure of DNA molecules.
   • Its interesting here that the boiling point of ethanamide is raised another ~100^o compared to the hydrogen bonded ethanoic acid. I'm not quite sure why? Can more hydrogen bonds be formed? Are much larger polymeric species formed in liquid ethanamide?
   • Not sure on this one but methanamide behaves in the same way with respect to methanoic acid!

   •  The chemistry of CARBOXYLIC ACIDS, ESTERS and other derivatives

   • -

Summary table of the 8 organic molecules discussed above plus some others

A survey and a preliminary summary table of the intermolecular forces operating in molecules containing 32/34 electrons

• Data abbreviations used: Mpt = melting point, Bpt = boiling point (given in Kelvin and Celsius)

• Here in section 8.2 examples are chosen from the eight homologous series listed below and all the molecules have 32–34 electrons and four larger C, N or O atoms plus hydrogen (except chloroethane C + C + Cl, but still has 34 electrons).

• Some abbreviations I've used to denote the different types of intermolecular bonding.

• Ins = instantaneous (temporary) dipole – induced dipole attraction (a sort of baseline force since it applies to all molecules, in fact it operates between ANY adjacent particles - atoms, ions or molecules).

• WP = weaker permanent dipole – permanent dipole attraction (doesn't seem to have much effect on the boiling point)

• SP stronger permanent dipole – permanent dipole attraction (NOT H bonding, but has a definite effect on the boiling point)

• HB = hydrogen bonding attraction - the strongest permanent dipole – permanent dipole attractive force, i.e. the strongest SP and has the largest effect on the boiling point)

• MHB multiple hydrogen bonding attraction sites on the molecule (i.e. where there are at least two 'functional' groups capable of two permanent dipole – permanent dipole interactions including hydrogen bonding, hence producing an even bigger effect on raising the boiling point)

• Note that permanent dipole – induced dipole Debye attractive forces are not mentioned much and generally only contribute a small portion of the total intermolecular force.

• Also, where I can obtain data, I've indicated the percentage contribution of the three types of intermolecular attraction which contribute to the total intermolecular force i.e. the % contributions to Van der Waals force where I've been able to get data.

• D = Debye dipole moment  units

Further discussion points

• 1–fluoropropane was added for comparison showing that the highly polar C–F bond does not appear to increase the intermolecular force for the same chain length (counting an F equal to a C) and same number of electrons and I'm not sure how to explain this, but fluorine and its compounds can be a bit anomolous!

In section 8.4 I've discussed more examples of comparative boiling points, intermolecular forces and number of electrons in the molecule which I hope will be of interest to the more 'inquisitive' students and teachers.

WHAT NEXT?

Part 8 sub–index: 8.1 Vapour pressure, nature, origin and examples explained * 8.2.1 Introduction to the types of intermolecular forces and examples explained (index) * 8.2.2 Detailed comparative discussion of boiling points of 8 organic molecule of similar molecular mass * 8.3 Boiling point plots of six organic homologous series - graphs and explanation * 8.4 Other case studies of boiling points related to intermolecular forces * 8.5 Steam distillation – theory and practice * Evidence and theory for hydrogen bonding in simple covalent hydride * 8.7 Solubility of covalent compounds, miscible and immiscible liquids

Advanced Equilibrium Chemistry Notes Part 1. Equilibrium, Le Chatelier's Principle–rules * Part 2. K_c and K_p equilibrium expressions and calculations * Part 3. Equilibrium and industrial processes * Part 4. Partition, solubility product and ion–exchange * Part 5. pH, weak–strong acid–base theory and calculations * Part 6. Salt hydrolysis, Acid–base titrations–indicators, pH curves and buffers * Part 7. Redox equilibria, half–cell electrode potentials, electrolysis and electrochemical series